From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12644 invoked by alias); 14 Oct 2002 18:16:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 12627 invoked by uid 71); 14 Oct 2002 18:16:02 -0000 Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 11:16:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20021014181602.12626.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: rth@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Richard Henderson Subject: Re: optimization/8165: builtin string functions SEGV on alpha-pc-linux-gnu at -O2 Reply-To: Richard Henderson X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg00548.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR optimization/8165; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Richard Henderson To: Glen Nakamura Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: optimization/8165: builtin string functions SEGV on alpha-pc-linux-gnu at -O2 Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 11:09:56 -0700 On Sat, Oct 12, 2002 at 08:39:25AM -1000, Glen Nakamura wrote: > Looking at try_replace_reg() again, I noticed that the REG_EQUAL note > isn't always replaced. Is the "else" really okay? Yes. Look again. We only bypass the else if we didn't make a substitution. r~