From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 928 invoked by alias); 17 Oct 2002 13:36:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 898 invoked by uid 71); 17 Oct 2002 13:36:02 -0000 Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 06:36:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20021017133602.897.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Nathanael Nerode Subject: Re: c/7344: performance regression on huge case statements Reply-To: Nathanael Nerode X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg00665.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR c/7344; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Nathanael Nerode To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, jh@suse.cz, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Subject: Re: c/7344: performance regression on huge case statements Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 09:28:01 -0400 Jan, your patch of October 14 had the ChangeLog entries for predict.c (can_predict_insn_p etc) and toplev.c (rest_of_compilation), but somehow the actual files failed to get committed. Either commit the files (preferred) or remove the ChangeLog entry, please. :-) http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=7344 Incidentally, with only the patch of October 11th (edge cache) the test case still seems to take forever. We'll see what happens once the patch of October 14th (eliminating unnecessary queries) is in place; I expect that to be more important based on your earlier numbers. --Nathanael