From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-23107-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 3436 invoked by alias); 18 Oct 2002 13:16:06 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 3422 invoked by uid 71); 18 Oct 2002 13:16:05 -0000
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2002 06:16:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20021018131605.3421.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Nathanael Nerode <neroden@twcny.rr.com>
Subject: Re: c/7344: performance regression on huge case statements
Reply-To: Nathanael Nerode <neroden@twcny.rr.com>
X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg00714.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR c/7344; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Nathanael Nerode <neroden@twcny.rr.com>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, rschiele@uni-mannheim.de,
   gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: c/7344: performance regression on huge case statements
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2002 09:13:39 -0400

 So it's down to 28 seconds.  That's still technically a regression, but 
 it's no longer so horrible.  Is this enough to close the report, or 
 downgrade its priority from high?
 
 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=7344