From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-23173-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 24888 invoked by alias); 21 Oct 2002 16:36:01 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 24871 invoked by uid 71); 21 Oct 2002 16:36:01 -0000
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 09:36:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20021021163601.24870.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: paolo@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini@unitus.it>
Subject: Re: c++/8279: REGRESSION: failure to find a matching function in
 ostream_iterator expansion
Reply-To: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini@unitus.it>
X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg00780.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR c++/8279; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini@unitus.it>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org,  gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,  jbuck@synopsys.com, 
 gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org,  paolo@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: c++/8279: REGRESSION: failure to find a matching function in
 ostream_iterator expansion
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 18:31:47 +0200

 Hi everyone,
 
 I'm tempted to agree with Wolfgang...
 
 Anyway, a quick couple of additional data points: both the widespread 
 EDG-based compilers agree with recent GCCs on this matter: Icc and 
 Comeau. Also, same behavior for Metrowerks CW8.2.
 
 Ciao, Paolo.
 
 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=8279