From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28260 invoked by alias); 23 Oct 2002 23:46:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 28245 invoked by uid 71); 23 Oct 2002 23:46:02 -0000 Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 16:46:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20021023234602.28244.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Janis Johnson Subject: Re: bootstrap/8146: gcc 3.2 miscompiles gcc 2.95.3 Reply-To: Janis Johnson X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg00911.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR bootstrap/8146; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Janis Johnson To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, prj@po.cwru.edu Cc: Subject: Re: bootstrap/8146: gcc 3.2 miscompiles gcc 2.95.3 Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 16:38:23 -0700 I tried this (bootstrapping GCC 2.95.3) with 3.2 that I built from a release tarball and with the 3.2 branch updated an hour or so ago, and with both of them I get the same bootstrap comparison failures that were reported in the PR: Bootstrap comparison failure! cccp.o differs f/data.o differs f/target.o differs This was on i686-pc-linux-gnu, with an old Caldera distribution plus binutils 2.12.1. http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=8146