From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18239 invoked by alias); 25 Oct 2002 07:16:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 18192 invoked by uid 71); 25 Oct 2002 07:16:02 -0000 Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 00:16:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20021025071602.18181.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Manuel Serrano Subject: Re: c/8108: Problem in the code generator for C and the linker is extremelly slow Reply-To: Manuel Serrano X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg00981.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR c/8108; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Manuel Serrano To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Subject: Re: c/8108: Problem in the code generator for C and the linker is extremelly slow Date: 25 Oct 2002 09:00:52 +0200 Hello there, Somtime ago I have posted a bug report of gcc3.2 and I have received the following: > Thank you very much for your problem report. > It has the internal identification `c/8108'. > The individual assigned to look at your > report is: unassigned. > > >Category: c > >Responsible: unassigned > >Synopsis: Problem in the code generator for C and the linker is extremelly slow > >Arrival-Date: Tue Oct 01 08:16:02 PDT 2002 This that time I have made extra experiments with several versions of Linux. I confirm that the problem comes from gcc3.2. With all the Linux kernels (2.4.18, 2.4.19, 2.4.20pre11), with all the file systems (ext2, ext3, reiserfs) I have tested, linking my huge (about 1 million lines of C code) last about a couple of seconds with gcc2.95 and gcc2.96 while it last about 40 minutes with gcc3.2. Are you aware of this problem? Do you think that it will be fixed for the next version of gcc? Many thanks in advance. -- Manuel