Re: c++/6074 is a regression from 2.95

[Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth@ticam.utexas.edu>]

The following reply was made to PR c++/6074; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth@ticam.utexas.edu>
To: Jan Vroonhof <jvlists@ntlworld.com>
Cc: Nathan Sidwell <nathan@codesourcery.com>, <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>,
   <gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org>, <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>, <wilson@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: c++/6074 is a regression from 2.95
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 10:47:57 -0500 (CDT)

 This patch (thanks, Jan, for the pointer)
   revision 1.944
   date: 2002/10/10 22:29:05;  author: wilson;  state: Exp;  lines: +0 -1
   Fix C++ FE attribute alias failure.
   	  * decl.c (duplicate_decls): Don't call decl_attributes.
 
 fixed c++/6074 and some duplicates on the mainline. I append it below. Can 
 someone consider moving it over to the 3.2 branch? I confirmed that it 
 fixes the regression there also, but I don't know whether it might have 
 some other adverse effects there.
 
 Regards
   Wolfgang
 
 Index: decl.c
 ===================================================================
 RCS file: /cvsroot/gcc/gcc/gcc/cp/decl.c,v
 retrieving revision 1.943
 retrieving revision 1.944
 diff -u -r1.943 -r1.944
 --- decl.c      9 Oct 2002 21:27:37 -0000       1.943
 +++ decl.c      10 Oct 2002 22:29:05 -0000      1.944
 @@ -3422,7 +3422,6 @@
       except for any that we copy here from the old type.  */
    DECL_ATTRIBUTES (newdecl)
      = (*targetm.merge_decl_attributes) (olddecl, newdecl);
 -  decl_attributes (&newdecl, DECL_ATTRIBUTES (newdecl), 0);
 
    if (TREE_CODE (newdecl) == TEMPLATE_DECL)
      {
 
 
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Wolfgang Bangerth              email:           bangerth@ticam.utexas.edu
                                www: http://www.ticam.utexas.edu/~bangerth