From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-23409-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 8122 invoked by alias); 25 Oct 2002 17:46:02 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 8076 invoked by uid 71); 25 Oct 2002 17:46:02 -0000
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 10:46:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20021025174602.8066.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Jim Wilson <wilson@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: c++/6074 is a regression from 2.95
Reply-To: Jim Wilson <wilson@redhat.com>
X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg01015.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR c++/6074; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Jim Wilson <wilson@redhat.com>
To: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth@ticam.utexas.edu>
Cc: Jan Vroonhof <jvlists@ntlworld.com>,
   Nathan Sidwell <nathan@codesourcery.com>, <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>,
   <gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org>, <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: c++/6074 is a regression from 2.95
Date: 25 Oct 2002 13:40:21 -0400

 As far as I know, this patch is safe for gcc-3.2.1, and would be useful there.
 
 Jim