From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7332 invoked by alias); 25 Oct 2002 20:26:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 7302 invoked by uid 71); 25 Oct 2002 20:26:01 -0000 Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 13:26:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20021025202601.7300.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Mark Mitchell Subject: Re: c++/6074 is a regression from 2.95 Reply-To: Mark Mitchell X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg01032.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR c++/6074; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Mark Mitchell To: Jim Wilson , Wolfgang Bangerth Cc: Jan Vroonhof , Nathan Sidwell , "gcc@gcc.gnu.org" , "gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org" , "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" Subject: Re: c++/6074 is a regression from 2.95 Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 13:21:53 -0700 --On Friday, October 25, 2002 01:40:21 PM -0400 Jim Wilson wrote: > As far as I know, this patch is safe for gcc-3.2.1, and would be useful > there. Jim -- Would you mind committing it there? Thanks, -- Mark Mitchell mark@codesourcery.com CodeSourcery, LLC http://www.codesourcery.com