From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32502 invoked by alias); 25 Oct 2002 21:46:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 32469 invoked by uid 71); 25 Oct 2002 21:46:02 -0000 Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 14:46:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20021025214602.32460.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Nathan Sidwell Subject: Re: libstdc++/6718: Boost1.28 run-time problem Reply-To: Nathan Sidwell X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg01038.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR libstdc++/6718; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Nathan Sidwell To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, pcarlini@unitus.it, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Subject: Re: libstdc++/6718: Boost1.28 run-time problem Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 22:36:05 +0100 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=6718 this is a libstdc++ issue. appears to specialize template<> struct numeric_limits to static double infinity() throw() { return __glibcpp_double_infinity; } and earlier, #ifndef __glibcpp_double_infinity #define __glibcpp_double_infinity 0.0 #endif on the mainline this is significantly different, using __builtin_huge_val. nathan