From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11642 invoked by alias); 25 Oct 2002 22:25:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 11622 invoked by uid 61); 25 Oct 2002 22:25:03 -0000 Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 15:25:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20021025222503.11621.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, kalbun@inwind.it, nobody@gcc.gnu.org From: bangerth@dealii.org Reply-To: bangerth@dealii.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, kalbun@inwind.it, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: c++/8226: g++ unable to complete compilation X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg01044.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: g++ unable to complete compilation State-Changed-From-To: open->closed State-Changed-By: bangerth State-Changed-When: Fri Oct 25 15:25:03 2002 State-Changed-Why: I cannot reproduce this, even with -O3. With gcc3.2.1pre and 3.3 CVS, the compile times are two to three times as long as with 2.95, but memory requirements are not much higher. Note also that gcc2.96 is not (and has never been) an officially supported version of gcc. You should contact Red Hat or Mandrake if this is important to you. For those wanting to reproduce my experiments, I attach a modified version of the file that can also be compiled with recent gccs (add std:: and typename in some places, etc, but nothing fundamental). http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=8226