From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-23525-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 7780 invoked by alias); 27 Oct 2002 21:46:03 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 7754 invoked by uid 71); 27 Oct 2002 21:46:02 -0000
Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 13:46:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20021027214601.7749.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Reichelt <reichelt@igpm.rwth-aachen.de>
Subject: Re: c++/5950: g++ - Internal error: Segmentation fault
Reply-To: Reichelt <reichelt@igpm.rwth-aachen.de>
X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg01131.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR c++/5950; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Reichelt <reichelt@igpm.rwth-aachen.de>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org,
        gianni@mariani.ws
Cc:  
Subject: Re: c++/5950: g++ - Internal error: Segmentation fault
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 00:31:17 +0200

 Hi,
 
 the code is in fact illegal, it already crashes gcc 2.95.x.
 Here's a cleaned-up version testcase:
 
 --------------snip here----------------------------
 template <typename T> struct A
 {
   void foo () {}
 };
 
 template void A<int>::foo; // illegal, should be foo();
 --------------snip here----------------------------
 
 Greetings,
 Volker
 
 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=5950