From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10488 invoked by alias); 28 Oct 2002 14:16:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 10426 invoked by uid 71); 28 Oct 2002 14:16:06 -0000 Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 06:16:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20021028141606.10424.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: toon@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Andris Pavenis Subject: Re: fortran/8308: gcc-3.x does not compile files with suffix .r (RATFOR) Reply-To: Andris Pavenis X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg01157.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR fortran/8308; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Andris Pavenis To: Toon Moene , toon@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, rchapman@acm.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Subject: Re: fortran/8308: gcc-3.x does not compile files with suffix .r (RATFOR) Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 17:16:14 +0200 On Monday 28 October 2002 12:07, Andris Pavenis wrote: > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=3Dview%20audit-trail&datab= ase=3D > > >gc c&pr=3D8308 > > > > I fixed this using Andris' suggestion (as attached). > > > > Andris, could you test this on your platform to see if it really does > > what it's supposed to do ? If so, I'll backport the solution to 3.2.1 > > as it is a regression w.r.t. 2.95 ... > > > > Thanks for looking into this. > > Unfortunatelly I don't have RATFOR installed (and don't have any experien= ce > with it, as never used it), but Bob Chapman have tested my DJGPP build of > gcc-3.3 20020926 after I applied a patch I sent here later and confirmed = it > fixes a problem (see > http://www.delorie.com/djgpp/mail-archives/browse.cgi?p=3Ddjgpp/2002/10/2= 2/11 >:31:19) Did remotely test on Linux after downloading and installing RATFOR77. Seems= =20 that included simple test program compiles Ok after the patch (gcc version= =20 3.3 20021027 (experimental)) but not with gcc-3.2 (I got behaviour describe= d=20 in bug report with gcc-3.2) Also: downloaded version of RATFOR does not recognize option -v, so compilation of test example fails when -v is specified.=20 Andris