From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-23562-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 11232 invoked by alias); 28 Oct 2002 19:16:04 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 11199 invoked by uid 71); 28 Oct 2002 19:16:02 -0000
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 11:16:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20021028191602.11196.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: bkoz@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Joe Buck <jbuck@synopsys.com>
Subject: Re: libstdc++/6745: Sever io problems on branch rdbuf
Reply-To: Joe Buck <jbuck@synopsys.com>
X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg01168.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR libstdc++/6745; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Joe Buck <jbuck@synopsys.com>
To: bkoz@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org,
   peter@snake.iap.physik.tu-darmstadt.de
Cc:  
Subject: Re: libstdc++/6745: Sever io problems on branch rdbuf
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 11:06:39 -0800

 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=6745
 
 I'm going to downgrade the priority of this PR to "medium".  The reason 
 is based
 on Paolo's comment:
 
  > After private mail with Benjamin we believe that this PR
  > unfortunately must be kept open. In fact, the behaviour of
  > v2 is restored but something is still NOT ok in this area.
 
 So, we still have a bug, but we no longer have a regression: this stuff
 works as well as it ever did.
 
 So this one should not hold up 3.2.1.  Unfortunately, there are about 15
 other high-priority PRs.