From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24494 invoked by alias); 28 Oct 2002 22:55:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 24428 invoked by uid 61); 28 Oct 2002 22:55:08 -0000 Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 14:55:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20021028225508.24427.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: bagnara@cs.unipr.it, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org From: bangerth@dealii.org Reply-To: bangerth@dealii.org, bagnara@cs.unipr.it, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: c++/7809: befriending inaccessible names X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg01187.txt.bz2 List-Id: Old Synopsis: g++ 3.2 accepts friend declarations concerning inaccessible methods New Synopsis: befriending inaccessible names State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed State-Changed-By: bangerth State-Changed-When: Mon Oct 28 14:55:07 2002 State-Changed-Why: As annoying as it seems, this is what the standard indeed says. There is a defect report (http://anubis.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_closed.html#209) on the matter, which was put into "Not a defect" status, meaning gcc is indeed non-conforming. Confirmed with present CVS. http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=7809