From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8235 invoked by alias); 29 Oct 2002 00:36:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 8219 invoked by uid 71); 29 Oct 2002 00:36:01 -0000 Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 16:36:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20021029003601.8218.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: "Kaveh R. Ghazi" Subject: Re: target/8366: sparc-sun-solaris2.7 C testsuite failure w/-m64 -fpic -O in execute/loop-2d.c Reply-To: "Kaveh R. Ghazi" X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg01196.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR target/8366; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Kaveh R. Ghazi" To: davem@redhat.com, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, jakub@redhat.com, jbuck@synopsys.com, mark@codesourcery.com, rth@redhat.com Cc: Subject: Re: target/8366: sparc-sun-solaris2.7 C testsuite failure w/-m64 -fpic -O in execute/loop-2d.c Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 19:28:08 -0500 (EST) > From: Joe Buck > > Do we have any reports of this testcase working for 64-bit sparc > and any release? In addition to the 3.2 and 3.1.1 releases, I also just tried GCC 3.0.4 on sparcv9 and still got the error. (Regular sparc bi-arch is disabled in 3.0.4, so I couldn't try plain sparc with -m64.) I also tried 2.95 but couldn't get sparcv9 to build there. I'm content with this PR not being a "regression" and thus getting less attention. However our release criteria state that we will test with PIC flags too. See http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.1/criteria.html under "Regresstion Tests". I offer the report and the sparc maintainers can decide if it warrants pursuing in 3.2.x or later on the trunk. I'm fine with whatever they decide. --Kaveh PS: Minor note, we don't have any updated 3.2.x or 3.3 criteria AFAICT. -- Kaveh R. Ghazi ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu