From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-23600-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 8847 invoked by alias); 29 Oct 2002 13:56:03 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 8811 invoked by uid 71); 29 Oct 2002 13:56:02 -0000
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 05:56:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20021029135602.8810.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: bkoz@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: "B. Kosnik" <bkoz@nabi.net>
Subject: Re: libstdc++/6745: Sever io problems on branch rdbuf
Reply-To: "B. Kosnik" <bkoz@nabi.net>
X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg01206.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR libstdc++/6745; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: "B. Kosnik" <bkoz@nabi.net>
To: Joe Buck <jbuck@synopsys.com>
Cc: bkoz@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org,
   peter@snake.iap.physik.tu-darmstadt.de
Subject: Re: libstdc++/6745: Sever io problems on branch rdbuf
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 05:47:29 -0800

 Again, I intend to look at this, but at the moment I am on the road. I
 should be able to work on this at the end of this week.
 
 
 >So, we still have a bug, but we no longer have a regression: this stuff
 >works as well as it ever did.