From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9701 invoked by alias); 29 Oct 2002 16:56:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 9649 invoked by uid 71); 29 Oct 2002 16:56:02 -0000 Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 08:56:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20021029165602.9643.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: bkoz@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Joe Buck Subject: Re: libstdc++/6745: Sever io problems on branch rdbuf Reply-To: Joe Buck X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg01208.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR libstdc++/6745; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Joe Buck To: bkoz@nabi.net (B. Kosnik) Cc: Joe.Buck@synopsys.COM (Joe Buck), bkoz@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, peter@snake.iap.physik.tu-darmstadt.de Subject: Re: libstdc++/6745: Sever io problems on branch rdbuf Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 08:47:56 -0800 (PST) I wrote: > >So, we still have a bug, but we no longer have a regression: this stuff > >works as well as it ever did. Benjamin Kosnik writes: > Again, I intend to look at this, but at the moment I am on the road. I > should be able to work on this at the end of this week. Since 6745 is no longer a regression, it seems that Mark would have to make an exception to the rules to even accept a patch for the branch. 6746, also assigned to you, has higher priority. It is a regression.