From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3758 invoked by alias); 30 Oct 2002 22:06:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 3711 invoked by uid 71); 30 Oct 2002 22:06:03 -0000 Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 14:06:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20021030220603.3710.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Nathanael Nerode Subject: Re: middle-end/179: gcc -O2 -Wuninitialized bug with &var under 2.95.2 Reply-To: Nathanael Nerode X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg01271.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR middle-end/179; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Nathanael Nerode To: martin@loewis.home.cs.tu-berlin.de, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, jsm28@cam.ac.uk, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gray.reply@256.com Cc: Subject: Re: middle-end/179: gcc -O2 -Wuninitialized bug with &var under 2.95.2 Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 16:57:03 -0500 Is this bug still valid against 3.x series gcc? http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=179