From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-23710-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 15772 invoked by alias); 31 Oct 2002 08:56:02 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 15730 invoked by uid 71); 31 Oct 2002 08:56:01 -0000
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 00:56:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20021031085601.15729.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Bruce Allen <ballen@gravity.phys.uwm.edu>
Subject: Re: c/8395: gcc 2.95.4 and 3.2 generate wrong code for double on
 intel
Reply-To: Bruce Allen <ballen@gravity.phys.uwm.edu>
X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg01316.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR c/8395; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Bruce Allen <ballen@gravity.phys.uwm.edu>
To: Marco Bernardo <bernardo@sti.uniurb.it>
Cc: Bruce Allen <ballen@aei.mpg.de>, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org,
       gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: c/8395: gcc 2.95.4 and 3.2 generate wrong code for double on
 intel
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 02:46:13 -0600 (CST)

 Hi Marco,
 
 > I can understand that the problem is related to the IEEE 754
 > representation.
 > 
 > However, let me point out some weaknesses in your argument:
 
 It's not an argument, it's simply the facts. Please read the materials
 that I refered you to.
 
 Bruce Alen