From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20725 invoked by alias); 31 Oct 2002 17:10:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 20691 invoked by uid 61); 31 Oct 2002 17:10:32 -0000 Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 09:10:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20021031171032.20690.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, gdr@gcc.gnu.org, pcarlini@unitus.it From: paolo@gcc.gnu.org Reply-To: paolo@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, gdr@gcc.gnu.org, pcarlini@unitus.it, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: libstdc++/6718: Boost1.28 run-time problem X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg01335.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: Boost1.28 run-time problem State-Changed-From-To: analyzed->closed State-Changed-By: paolo State-Changed-When: Thu Oct 31 09:10:31 2002 State-Changed-Why: I'm closing this. In fact current mainline is not affected by this specific problem (another PR will be probably filed for a different abort, happening later at run time) and this is not a regression from 3.0 and 3.1. However, I have confirmed when the test is compiled by 2.95.x the early abort does not happen: something may be wrong with either v3 or the boost/random, we don't know, right now. I will try to isolate the problem in a small testcase. Ciao, Paolo. http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=6718