From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-23730-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 4450 invoked by alias); 31 Oct 2002 17:16:02 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 4393 invoked by uid 71); 31 Oct 2002 17:16:01 -0000
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 09:16:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20021031171601.4384.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@integrable-solutions.net>
Subject: Re: c++/7585: Attributes for nested typedef-name ignored
Reply-To: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@integrable-solutions.net>
X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg01336.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR c++/7585; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@integrable-solutions.net>
To: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth@ticam.utexas.edu>
Cc: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, <gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: c++/7585: Attributes for nested typedef-name ignored
Date: 31 Oct 2002 18:01:29 +0100

 Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth@ticam.utexas.edu> writes:
 
 [...]
 
 | I think it would help to have a formal specification of attribute 
 | placement somewhere.
 
 Definitely.  And the GCC documentation has wording to that effect.
 
 -- Gaby