From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18952 invoked by alias); 1 Nov 2002 21:46:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 18920 invoked by uid 71); 1 Nov 2002 21:46:02 -0000 Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2002 13:46:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20021101214602.18918.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Kevin Ryde Subject: Re: optimization/6162: gcc 3.0.4: certain i386 asm reloader ice Reply-To: Kevin Ryde X-SW-Source: 2002-11/txt/msg00045.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR optimization/6162; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Kevin Ryde To: Michael Matz Cc: Nathanael Nerode , , , , , =?iso-8859-1?q?Torbj=F6rn?= Granlund Subject: Re: optimization/6162: gcc 3.0.4: certain i386 asm reloader ice Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2002 07:40:40 +1000 Michael Matz writes: > > To fix this indeed would be quite involved, as we would need to handle > then all permutations of swappings (of which there are 4 with two pairs). As a suggestion in the interim, perhaps internally all but the last commutative could be quietly dropped. If only the last is acted on now anyway then it'd be no loss, and it'd let applications give full information, if that might be useful in the future.