From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25811 invoked by alias); 1 Nov 2002 23:12:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 25787 invoked by uid 61); 1 Nov 2002 23:12:27 -0000 Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2002 15:12:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20021101231227.25786.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, schmid@snake.iap.physik.tu-darmstadt.de From: bangerth@dealii.org Reply-To: bangerth@dealii.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, schmid@snake.iap.physik.tu-darmstadt.de, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: c++/5249: sorry, not implemented: `component_ref' X-SW-Source: 2002-11/txt/msg00053.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: sorry, not implemented: `component_ref' State-Changed-From-To: analyzed->closed State-Changed-By: bangerth State-Changed-When: Fri Nov 1 15:12:27 2002 State-Changed-Why: This code is severely ill-formed, so I would guess that already the previous state of issuing an (admittedly misleading) error would have been ok, but present CVS gives a better message. http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=5249