From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6345 invoked by alias); 4 Nov 2002 15:43:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 6321 invoked by uid 61); 4 Nov 2002 15:43:28 -0000 Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2002 07:43:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20021104154328.6320.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: bagnara@cs.unipr.it, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, paolo@gcc.gnu.org From: paolo@gcc.gnu.org Reply-To: paolo@gcc.gnu.org, bagnara@cs.unipr.it, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, paolo@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: c++/8448: Regression from gcc 2.96 concerning nested namespaces X-SW-Source: 2002-11/txt/msg00156.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: Regression from gcc 2.96 concerning nested namespaces Responsible-Changed-From-To: unassigned->paolo Responsible-Changed-By: paolo Responsible-Changed-When: Mon Nov 4 07:43:26 2002 Responsible-Changed-Why: . State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback State-Changed-By: paolo State-Changed-When: Mon Nov 4 07:43:26 2002 State-Changed-Why: Ciao Roberto. It doesn't compile for me with Comeau in *strict* mode (i.e., --strict switch, -Xc for Intel), just tested with the online compiler. First blush, seems to me very similar to c++/8279 (not a bug) ... http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=8448