From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3215 invoked by alias); 4 Nov 2002 16:01:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 3173 invoked by uid 61); 4 Nov 2002 16:01:35 -0000 Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2002 08:01:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20021104160135.3170.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: bagnara@cs.unipr.it, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, paolo@gcc.gnu.org From: bangerth@dealii.org Reply-To: bangerth@dealii.org, bagnara@cs.unipr.it, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, paolo@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: c++/8448: Regression from gcc 2.96 concerning nested namespaces X-SW-Source: 2002-11/txt/msg00160.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: Regression from gcc 2.96 concerning nested namespaces State-Changed-From-To: feedback->closed State-Changed-By: bangerth State-Changed-When: Mon Nov 4 08:01:33 2002 State-Changed-Why: Paolo is right. Your op<< is in another namespace, and the using directive only makes it visible in the global namespace, but not where it is needed: in std::copy or std::ostream_iterator. http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=8448