From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16619 invoked by alias); 5 Nov 2002 15:48:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 16590 invoked by uid 61); 5 Nov 2002 15:48:31 -0000 Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2002 07:48:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20021105154831.16588.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: Padraig@linux.ie, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org From: bangerth@dealii.org Reply-To: bangerth@dealii.org, Padraig@linux.ie, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: c/4412: possible warning of logic errors not given X-SW-Source: 2002-11/txt/msg00220.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: possible warning of logic errors not given State-Changed-From-To: open->closed State-Changed-By: bangerth State-Changed-When: Tue Nov 5 07:48:30 2002 State-Changed-Why: I think you want to much. People use this style of programming to make it more clear what they intend, and they will not want to get a warning on that. However, if you disagree (and maybe volunteer to implement such a warning),we can of course reopen this report. http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=4412