From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25359 invoked by alias); 5 Nov 2002 15:57:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 25329 invoked by uid 61); 5 Nov 2002 15:57:46 -0000 Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2002 07:57:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20021105155746.25328.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: brian@trellian.com, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org From: bangerth@dealii.org Reply-To: bangerth@dealii.org, brian@trellian.com, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: c/5111: Misleading error message for "unsigned long double" X-SW-Source: 2002-11/txt/msg00221.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: Misleading error message for "unsigned long double" State-Changed-From-To: open->closed State-Changed-By: bangerth State-Changed-When: Tue Nov 5 07:57:45 2002 State-Changed-Why: I think the warning is actually ok: unsigned short double fred; is recognized as "unsigned short" plus "double", while unsigned long double fred; is recognized as "unsigned" plus "long double", which makes all the difference in the messages. I think, the message as it is is actually sufficiently helpful to find this kind of error :-) http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=5111