From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24101 invoked by alias); 5 Nov 2002 17:16:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 24065 invoked by uid 71); 5 Nov 2002 17:16:02 -0000 Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2002 09:16:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20021105171602.24064.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Wolfgang Bangerth Subject: Re: c/2678: gcc/g++ should stick compilation options into the .o file Reply-To: Wolfgang Bangerth X-SW-Source: 2002-11/txt/msg00237.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR c/2678; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Wolfgang Bangerth To: Phil Edwards Cc: rfg@monkeys.com, Subject: Re: c/2678: gcc/g++ should stick compilation options into the .o file Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 11:09:46 -0600 (CST) > [ note that the pedwards address is now invalid ] Yeah, I noticed that. > > you two have been writing a _lot_ of text about this report, but from > > reading two sentences every second page, I was not clear about whether > > anything has been implemented at all. What's the status of this report? > > > > I'm just trying to sift through the old reports and try to close that are > > no longer valid. 1800+ non-closed reports is simply getting too many... > > It should be suspended, not closed. The idea is a good one, but I don't > have time right now to actively work on it. OK, I'll do that. Thanks W. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Wolfgang Bangerth email: bangerth@ticam.utexas.edu www: http://www.ticam.utexas.edu/~bangerth