From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15069 invoked by alias); 5 Nov 2002 17:56:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 15038 invoked by uid 71); 5 Nov 2002 17:56:01 -0000 Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2002 09:56:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20021105175601.15037.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: paolo@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Roberto Bagnara Subject: Re: c++/8448: Regression from gcc 2.96 concerning nested namespaces Reply-To: Roberto Bagnara X-SW-Source: 2002-11/txt/msg00241.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR c++/8448; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Roberto Bagnara To: bagnara@cs.unipr.it, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, paolo@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Subject: Re: c++/8448: Regression from gcc 2.96 concerning nested namespaces Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2002 18:46:43 +0100 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=8448 Thanks everyone: I have studied the issue and now I understand what's going on and why. I only wonder if g++ is not being a bit too pedantic (without being asked to do so) on this rather controversial issue. All the best Roberto -- Prof. Roberto Bagnara Computer Science Group Department of Mathematics, University of Parma, Italy http://www.cs.unipr.it/~bagnara/ mailto:bagnara@cs.unipr.it