From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2683 invoked by alias); 6 Nov 2002 00:02:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 2651 invoked by uid 61); 6 Nov 2002 00:02:03 -0000 Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2002 16:02:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20021106000203.2650.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, java-prs@gcc.gnu.org, mark@klomp.org, tromey@gcc.gnu.org From: tromey@gcc.gnu.org Reply-To: tromey@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, java-prs@gcc.gnu.org, mark@klomp.org, tromey@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: java/6388: Integer.MIN_VALUE == 0x80000000 optimized to false on powerpc X-SW-Source: 2002-11/txt/msg00267.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: Integer.MIN_VALUE == 0x80000000 optimized to false on powerpc State-Changed-From-To: analyzed->closed State-Changed-By: tromey State-Changed-When: Tue Nov 5 16:02:03 2002 State-Changed-Why: I've checked in the fix http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=6388