From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11647 invoked by alias); 6 Nov 2002 17:36:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 11561 invoked by uid 71); 6 Nov 2002 17:36:08 -0000 Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2002 09:36:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20021106173608.11538.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: bkoz@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Gabriel Dos Reis Subject: Re: libstdc++/3181: Unable to use sqrt,cos,sin,... with int argument. Reply-To: Gabriel Dos Reis X-SW-Source: 2002-11/txt/msg00308.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR libstdc++/3181; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Gabriel Dos Reis To: Wolfgang Bangerth Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: libstdc++/3181: Unable to use sqrt,cos,sin,... with int argument. Date: 06 Nov 2002 18:29:24 +0100 Wolfgang Bangerth writes: | The following reply was made to PR libstdc++/3181; it has been noted by GNATS. | | From: Wolfgang Bangerth | To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org | Cc: | Subject: Re: libstdc++/3181: Unable to use sqrt,cos,sin,... with int argument. | Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2002 11:18:58 -0600 (CST) | | ...and still with 3.3 CVS from 20021103. | | However, are the overloads for int mandated? No, there are not. In fact adding such overloads would tehcnically mean non-conformance (even though we all agree that C++ broke things here). | I think not (only floating | point types), and then the bug is not a bug and should be closed, right? Well, mark it as a request-feature (I want to have it somehow "active" but in the passive sense :-) -- Gaby