From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4075 invoked by alias); 6 Nov 2002 22:46:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 4056 invoked by uid 71); 6 Nov 2002 22:46:06 -0000 Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2002 14:46:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20021106224606.4055.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Phil Edwards Subject: Re: libstdc++/3195: STL warning on Solaris with GCC 3.0 Reply-To: Phil Edwards X-SW-Source: 2002-11/txt/msg00336.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR libstdc++/3195; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Phil Edwards To: bangerth@dealii.org, Sylvain.Pion@sophia.inria.fr, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Subject: Re: libstdc++/3195: STL warning on Solaris with GCC 3.0 Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2002 17:38:39 -0500 On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 05:20:11PM -0000, bangerth@dealii.org wrote: > Synopsis: STL warning on Solaris with GCC 3.0 > > State-Changed-From-To: suspended->closed > State-Changed-By: bangerth > State-Changed-When: Wed Nov 6 09:20:08 2002 > State-Changed-Why: > This has recently been fixed with some fixinclude hacks, as > far as I know. They were proposed and discussed, but were any of them approved and checked in? I don't see anything obvious in gcc/ChangeLog. Phil -- I would therefore like to posit that computing's central challenge, viz. "How not to make a mess of it," has /not/ been met. - Edsger Dijkstra, 1930-2002