From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31963 invoked by alias); 7 Nov 2002 08:06:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 31949 invoked by uid 71); 7 Nov 2002 08:06:02 -0000 Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2002 00:06:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20021107080602.31948.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Neil Booth Subject: Re: c++/7307: -pedantic makes errors to warnings Reply-To: Neil Booth X-SW-Source: 2002-11/txt/msg00358.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR c++/7307; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Neil Booth To: Wolfgang Bangerth Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gdr@integrable-solutions.net Subject: Re: c++/7307: -pedantic makes errors to warnings Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2002 07:58:01 +0000 Wolfgang Bangerth wrote:- > in the audit trail of c++/7307, Gaby points you to a patch that made the > code in the report act in a strange way. What's the state of this? > > (I don't think that the patch could have been the culprit, since I see the > exact same behavior with 2.95, but wanted to ask anyway.) I have no idea; I didn't think my patch would change such behaviour, so I'm not surprised you also see it with 2.95. Neil.