public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: jdonner0@earthlink.net To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: c/8506: 3.3 (1104) disallowing omission of parameters in fn def Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2002 09:56:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20021108175224.25503.qmail@sources.redhat.com> (raw) >Number: 8506 >Category: c >Synopsis: 3.3 (1104) disallowing omission of parameters in fn def >Confidential: no >Severity: serious >Priority: medium >Responsible: unassigned >State: open >Class: rejects-legal >Submitter-Id: net >Arrival-Date: Fri Nov 08 09:56:04 PST 2002 >Closed-Date: >Last-Modified: >Originator: Jeff Donner >Release: gcc version 3.3 20021104 (experimental) >Organization: >Environment: cygwin, Win2K >Description: gcc now makes it an error to omit parameter names, eg int foo(int /* note, omitted parameter name*/){} now gives an error. $ gcc foo.c foo.c: In function `foo': foo.c:1: error: parameter name omitted I'm not a language lawyer but I know there's scads of code that uses this as a clean way to show a fn doesn't actually use its parameters. And I believe it's correct usage, many other compilers (VC, Borland at least) allow it. This would break a lot of code. This shouldn't even be a warning unless it is specifically asked for. >How-To-Repeat: gcc foo.c >Fix: >Release-Note: >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted: ----gnatsweb-attachment---- Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="foo.c" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="foo.c" aW50IGZvbyhpbnQpe30NCg==
next reply other threads:[~2002-11-08 17:56 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2002-11-08 9:56 jdonner0 [this message] 2002-11-08 10:06 Phil Edwards 2002-11-08 10:16 Richard Earnshaw 2002-11-08 10:36 Christian Ehrhardt 2002-11-08 11:59 pme
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20021108175224.25503.qmail@sources.redhat.com \ --to=jdonner0@earthlink.net \ --cc=gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).