From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-24214-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 7926 invoked by alias); 8 Nov 2002 20:46:03 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 7909 invoked by uid 71); 8 Nov 2002 20:46:02 -0000
Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2002 12:46:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20021108204602.7907.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nathan@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth@ticam.utexas.edu>
Subject: Re: c++/764: g++ 2.95.2 fails to find a friend operator when
 dereferencing a pointer
Reply-To: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth@ticam.utexas.edu>
X-SW-Source: 2002-11/txt/msg00428.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR c++/764; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth@ticam.utexas.edu>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: c++/764: g++ 2.95.2 fails to find a friend operator when
 dereferencing a pointer
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2002 14:48:55 -0600 (CST)

 This still exists, even with 3.3 CVS. The normative clause in the standard 
 is probably 14.5.3.3.
 
 W.
 
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Wolfgang Bangerth              email:           bangerth@ticam.utexas.edu
                                www: http://www.ticam.utexas.edu/~bangerth