From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20302 invoked by alias); 11 Nov 2002 06:44:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 20279 invoked by uid 61); 11 Nov 2002 06:44:07 -0000 Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2002 22:44:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20021111064407.20278.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: 157416@bugs.debian.org, asuffield@debian.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, neil@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org From: neil@gcc.gnu.org Reply-To: neil@gcc.gnu.org, 157416@bugs.debian.org, asuffield@debian.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, neil@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: preprocessor/8524: _Pragma within macros is improperly expanded X-SW-Source: 2002-11/txt/msg00510.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: _Pragma within macros is improperly expanded Responsible-Changed-From-To: unassigned->neil Responsible-Changed-By: neil Responsible-Changed-When: Sun Nov 10 22:44:07 2002 Responsible-Changed-Why: Mine. State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed State-Changed-By: neil State-Changed-When: Sun Nov 10 22:44:07 2002 State-Changed-Why: Yah, I'm not entirely surprised; the code in question is not pretty. I'll take another look. http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=8524