From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20561 invoked by alias); 14 Nov 2002 08:46:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 20542 invoked by uid 71); 14 Nov 2002 08:46:09 -0000 Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 09:26:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20021114084609.20541.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: overseers@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Jason Molenda Subject: Re: web/638: Broken gcc-cvs links Reply-To: Jason Molenda X-SW-Source: 2002-11/txt/msg00655.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR web/638; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Jason Molenda To: "Joseph S. Myers" Cc: neroden@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, overseers@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: web/638: Broken gcc-cvs links Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 00:37:05 -0800 On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 08:26:53AM +0000, Joseph S. Myers wrote: > It is not working. The link in the PR does not work, and such links are > still being generated (for example, > contains such a > link). Not to be a Negative Nelly, but I don't expect this to get fixed any time soon. No one among the sources/gcc.gnu.org maintainers have jumped at it; the cvsweb maintainers have wandered off to other things, and cvs in general is an unloved, can't-get-replaced-quick-enough child of the free software world. The best one could hope for is to look at viewcvs and see if they've solved this problem. But if I'm not mistaken, even they have their eyes cast towards svn these days. J