From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19188 invoked by alias); 14 Nov 2002 13:26:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 19174 invoked by uid 71); 14 Nov 2002 13:26:07 -0000 Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 17:56:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20021114132607.19173.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Kelledin Subject: Re: target/8569: gcc on alpha does not support global variables in shared objects Reply-To: Kelledin X-SW-Source: 2002-11/txt/msg00675.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR target/8569; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Kelledin To: kelledin@users.sourceforge.net, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Subject: Re: target/8569: gcc on alpha does not support global variables in shared objects Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 08:13:54 -0500 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=3Dview%20audit-trail&database=3D= gcc&pr=3D8569 Gah...never mind. I just recompiled gcc, and the problem mysteriously went away. I'm not sure how that fixed it, and I'm not sure I want to look a=20 gift-horse in the mouth. In the meantime, I suggest we just=20 close this bug report... --=20 Kelledin "If a server crashes in a server farm and no one pings it, does=20 it still cost four figures to fix?"