From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12329 invoked by alias); 14 Nov 2002 19:12:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 12310 invoked by uid 61); 14 Nov 2002 19:12:28 -0000 Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 18:14:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20021114191228.12309.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: gawrilow@math.tu-berlin.de, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org From: reichelt@igpm.rwth-aachen.de Reply-To: reichelt@igpm.rwth-aachen.de, gawrilow@math.tu-berlin.de, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: c++/8582: 3.2.1 pre-release: ICE in exception handling X-SW-Source: 2002-11/txt/msg00691.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: 3.2.1 pre-release: ICE in exception handling State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed State-Changed-By: reichelt State-Changed-When: Thu Nov 14 11:12:27 2002 State-Changed-Why: Confirmed. The question whether this is actually a regression or not is not that easy to answer: The preprocessed file also crashes gcc 3.2 and gcc 3.0.4 with the same error message. gcc 3.1 produces a segfault (I didn't investigate that further). But since you said it's definitely a regression, I assume that the header files have changed. Could you please provide a preprocessed file that does *not* crash 3.1 for example? http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=8582