From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15465 invoked by alias); 14 Nov 2002 19:20:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 15445 invoked by uid 61); 14 Nov 2002 19:20:50 -0000 Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 18:15:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20021114192050.15444.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, hristo@dir.bg, nobody@gcc.gnu.org From: bangerth@dealii.org Reply-To: bangerth@dealii.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, hristo@dir.bg, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: optimization/8583: gcc version 2.95.3 passing parameters bug X-SW-Source: 2002-11/txt/msg00692.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: gcc version 2.95.3 passing parameters bug State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback State-Changed-By: bangerth State-Changed-When: Thu Nov 14 11:20:50 2002 State-Changed-Why: I cannot reproduce this, with neither 2.95 not 3.2 nor 3.3. However, you do not tell us which flags you use for compilation. Can you please provide this information, and possibly also check whether you get the same problem with present-day gccs (i.e. 3.2)? http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=8583