From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-24569-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 27941 invoked by alias); 15 Nov 2002 22:16:03 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 27893 invoked by uid 71); 15 Nov 2002 22:16:02 -0000
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 13:46:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20021115221602.27887.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: jason@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Daniel Berlin <dberlin@dberlin.org>
Subject: Re: c++/5: C++ sucks, can't you make it better?
Reply-To: Daniel Berlin <dberlin@dberlin.org>
X-SW-Source: 2002-11/txt/msg00783.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR c++/5; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Daniel Berlin <dberlin@dberlin.org>
To: billingd@gcc.gnu.org, <gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>,
	<gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>, <jason@gcc.gnu.org>, <jsm@cygnus.com>,
	<gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org>
Cc:  
Subject: Re: c++/5: C++ sucks, can't you make it better?
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 17:10:12 -0500 (EST)

 On 15 Nov 2002 billingd@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
 
 > Synopsis: C++ sucks, can't you make it better?
 > 
 > State-Changed-From-To: analyzed->closed
 > State-Changed-By: billingd
 > State-Changed-When: Fri Nov 15 14:00:33 2002
 > State-Changed-Why:
 >     Work around exists.  Use flag "-c x"
 
 Err, you mean -x c.
 
 You must be used to programming in C, where a[5] is equivalent to 5[a].
 :P