From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-24628-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 11895 invoked by alias); 16 Nov 2002 17:06:03 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 11881 invoked by uid 71); 16 Nov 2002 17:06:02 -0000
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 10:46:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20021116170602.11880.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Wolfgang Wieser <wwieser@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: c++/8511: (hopefully) reproducible cc1plus SIGSEGV.
Reply-To: Wolfgang Wieser <wwieser@gmx.de>
X-SW-Source: 2002-11/txt/msg00842.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR c++/8511; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Wolfgang Wieser <wwieser@gmx.de>
To: Zack Weinberg <zack@codesourcery.com>
Cc: mark@codesourcery.com,
 Volker Reichelt <reichelt@igpm.rwth-aachen.de>,
 gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org,
 gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: c++/8511: (hopefully) reproducible cc1plus SIGSEGV.
Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2002 17:57:34 +0100

 > > Okay, I just found the e-mail containing a test case triggering a bug in
 > > c_expand_expr:
 > >
 > > [snipped]
 > > 
 > This bug is still reproducible with the 3.2.1 prerelease and with CVS
 > HEAD.  I get a different ICE with 2.95.
 >
 > Hopefully this will get fixed in 3.3, but I cannot promise anything.
 > Since this bug is c++/6971, do you agree we can close c++/8511 once
 > the segmentation fault is patched?
 >
 Yes, I think that is okay. 
 
 (And thanks for the quick responses.)
 
 Greets,
 Wolfgang