From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12051 invoked by alias); 18 Nov 2002 01:36:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 12029 invoked by uid 71); 18 Nov 2002 01:36:01 -0000 Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 13:33:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20021118013601.12026.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: "Mark O'Donohue" Subject: Re: optimization/8613: -O3 optimisation of ++ generates wrong code Reply-To: "Mark O'Donohue" X-SW-Source: 2002-11/txt/msg00857.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR optimization/8613; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Mark O'Donohue" To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, mark.odonohue@cytopia.com.au, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Subject: Re: optimization/8613: -O3 optimisation of ++ generates wrong code Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 12:28:45 +1100 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=8613 confirmed on redhat 8.0 Also it seem tied up with i686 architecture. Since on redhat 8.0 gcc 3.2: g++ -O2 test1.cpp works: and on mandrak9.0 gcc 3.2 g++ -O2 -march=i386 test1.cpp also works. Mark