From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11356 invoked by alias); 18 Nov 2002 12:26:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 11340 invoked by uid 71); 18 Nov 2002 12:26:05 -0000 Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 15:46:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20021118122605.11339.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Nathan Sidwell Subject: Re: c++/2112 Reply-To: Nathan Sidwell X-SW-Source: 2002-11/txt/msg00870.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR c++/2112; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Nathan Sidwell To: Wolfgang Bangerth Cc: nathan@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: c++/2112 Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 12:25:23 +0000 Wolfgang Bangerth wrote: > Nathan, > you marked this report as confirmed. How strongly do you feel about this? > I think the message I get is actually not wrong, so at the most I would > concede to make it a feature-request and mark it as that (and maybe put it > in suspended mode?). I agree that the message 2.95 (the lower one below) I don't feel strongly. an analyzed feature request would be fin. nathan -- Dr Nathan Sidwell :: http://www.codesourcery.com :: CodeSourcery LLC 'But that's a lie.' - 'Yes it is. What's your point?' nathan@codesourcery.com : http://www.cs.bris.ac.uk/~nathan/ : nathan@acm.org