From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-24664-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 28396 invoked by alias); 18 Nov 2002 16:36:04 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 28371 invoked by uid 71); 18 Nov 2002 16:36:02 -0000
Resent-Date: 18 Nov 2002 16:36:02 -0000
Resent-Message-ID: <20021118163602.28368.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
Resent-From: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org (GNATS Filer)
Resent-Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Resent-Reply-To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, laurent@ient.rwth-aachen.de
Received: (qmail 26904 invoked by uid 61); 18 Nov 2002 16:28:24 -0000
Message-Id: <20021118162824.26903.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 22:36:00 -0000
From: laurent@ient.rwth-aachen.de
Reply-To: laurent@ient.rwth-aachen.de
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
X-Send-Pr-Version: gnatsweb-2.9.3 (1.1.1.1.2.31)
Subject: c++/8622: typename of base class
X-SW-Source: 2002-11/txt/msg00878.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>


>Number:         8622
>Category:       c++
>Synopsis:       typename of base class
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       serious
>Priority:       low
>Responsible:    unassigned
>State:          open
>Class:          sw-bug
>Submitter-Id:   net
>Arrival-Date:   Mon Nov 18 08:36:01 PST 2002
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator:     laurent@ient.rwth-aachen.de
>Release:        gcc3.2
>Organization:
>Environment:
cygwin, probably every other
>Description:
A type definition, defined by a template typename in a base class, is not understood in the derived class.
This work with Visual 7 or Intel Compiler 6, but gcc gives the following unjustified warnings:

warnings: 'typename B<V>::value_type' is implicitly a typename
warnings: implicit typename is deprecated, please see the documentation for details

Am I wrong ?
If it is really a bug, please correct it, because it is quite important for my big project.

Patrick
>How-To-Repeat:
template<class V>
struct value_traits
{
  typedef V value_type;
};


template<class V>
struct A
{
  typedef typename value_traits<V>::value_type value_type;
};

template<class V>
struct B : public A<V>
{
  value_type v;
};

int main()
{
  B<int> b;
  return 0;
}
>Fix:

>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted: