From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-24666-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 12683 invoked by alias); 18 Nov 2002 16:56:20 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 12669 invoked by uid 71); 18 Nov 2002 16:56:18 -0000
Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 00:11:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20021118165618.12668.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@integrable-solutions.net>
Subject: Re: c++/8622: typename of base class
Reply-To: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@integrable-solutions.net>
X-SW-Source: 2002-11/txt/msg00880.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR c++/8622; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@integrable-solutions.net>
To: laurent@ient.rwth-aachen.de
Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: c++/8622: typename of base class
Date: 18 Nov 2002 17:47:15 +0100

 laurent@ient.rwth-aachen.de writes:
 
 [...]
 
 | >Class:          sw-bug
 
 this is not a bug.
 
 [...]
 
 | >Description:
 | A type definition, defined by a template typename in a base class, is not understood in the derived class.
 | This work with Visual 7 or Intel Compiler 6, but gcc gives the following unjustified warnings:
 
 GCC's behaviour is correct. VC7 is bogus.
 
 -- Gaby