From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-24703-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 6783 invoked by alias); 18 Nov 2002 23:22:48 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 6764 invoked by uid 61); 18 Nov 2002 23:22:48 -0000
Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 14:28:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20021118232248.6763.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, lucier@math.purdue.edu,
  nobody@gcc.gnu.org
From: bangerth@dealii.org
Reply-To: bangerth@dealii.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
  lucier@math.purdue.edu, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: optimization/2001: Inordinately long compile times in reload CSE regs
X-SW-Source: 2002-11/txt/msg00917.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

Synopsis: Inordinately long compile times in reload CSE regs

State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
State-Changed-By: bangerth
State-Changed-When: Mon Nov 18 15:22:46 2002
State-Changed-Why:
    Brad, can you confirm whether this problem still applies? If
    it is a regression w.r.t. 2.95, then we may want to raise
    its priority.
    
    Thanks
      Wolfgang

http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=2001