From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11926 invoked by alias); 18 Nov 2002 23:35:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 11892 invoked by uid 61); 18 Nov 2002 23:35:53 -0000 Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 15:56:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20021118233553.11891.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, oldham@codesourcery.com From: bangerth@dealii.org Reply-To: bangerth@dealii.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, oldham@codesourcery.com, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: debug/2851: dbxout.c's concat loses information X-SW-Source: 2002-11/txt/msg00922.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: dbxout.c's concat loses information State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback State-Changed-By: bangerth State-Changed-When: Mon Nov 18 15:35:53 2002 State-Changed-Why: Jeffrey, I tried to reproduce this, but have no problems to compile the code. However, maybe that was not the problem you meant, after all, the report is a little bit terse on what you expect the code to do or not do :-) Can you please see whether this still applies, and if so give instructions on how to reproduce the effects you want to demonstrate? Thanks Wolfgang http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=2851