From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21648 invoked by alias); 18 Nov 2002 23:56:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 21631 invoked by uid 71); 18 Nov 2002 23:56:03 -0000 Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 20:26:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20021118235603.21630.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Jeffrey Oldham Subject: Re: debug/2851: dbxout.c's concat loses information Reply-To: Jeffrey Oldham X-SW-Source: 2002-11/txt/msg00927.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR debug/2851; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Jeffrey Oldham To: bangerth@dealii.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, oldham@codesourcery.com, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Subject: Re: debug/2851: dbxout.c's concat loses information Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 15:50:02 -0800 bangerth@dealii.org wrote: > Synopsis: dbxout.c's concat loses information > > State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback > State-Changed-By: bangerth > State-Changed-When: Mon Nov 18 15:35:53 2002 > State-Changed-Why: > Jeffrey, > I tried to reproduce this, but have no problems to compile > the code. However, maybe that was not the problem you > meant, after all, the report is a little bit terse on > what you expect the code to do or not do :-) > > Can you please see whether this still applies, and if so > give instructions on how to reproduce the effects you want > to demonstrate? > > Thanks > Wolfgang > > http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=2851 I do not even know what the problem was. Let's drop it. Thanks, Jeffrey D. Oldham oldham@codesourcery.com